|
Recommended Sources
|
|
Alexander, R. (2010). Children, their world, their education: Final report and recommendations of the Cambridge primary review. Routledge: Abingdon.
|
|
Alexander, R. (2014). The best that has been thought and said. Forum., 56(1), 2014.
|
|
Au, W. (2011). Teaching under the new Taylorism: High-stakes testing and the standardization of the 21st century curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(1), 25–45.
|
|
Berliner, D. (2011). Rational responses to high stakes testing: The case of curriculum narrowing and the harm that follows. Cambridge Journal of Education, 41(3), 287–302.
|
|
Biesta, G. (2004). Against Learning: Reclaiming a language for education in an Age of Learning. Nordisk Pedagogik, 23, 70–82.
|
|
Biesta, G., & Priestley, M. (2013). Capacities and the curriculum. In M. Priestley & G. Biesta (Eds.), Reinventing the curriculum: New trends in curriculum, policy and practice (pp. 35–49). London: Bloomsbury.
|
|
Butler, D., Leahy, M., Twining, P., Akoh, B., Chtouki, Y., Farshadnia, S., et al. (2018). Education systems in the digital age: The need for alignment. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 23(3), 473–494.
|
|
Creese, B., Gonzalez, A., & Isaacs, T. (2016). Comparing international curriculum systems: The international instructional systems study. Curriculum Journal, 27(1), 5–23.
|
|
Department of Education and Skills. (2017a). Digital learning framework for primary schools. Dublin: Department of Education and Skills. https://www.education.ie/en/Schools-Colleges/Information/Information-Communications-Technology-ICT-in-Schools/digital-learning-framework-primary.pdf. Accessed 20 Apr 2020.
|
|
Department of Education and Skills. (2017b). Digital learning framework for post-primary schools. Dublin: Department of Education and Skills. https://www.education.ie/en/Schools-Colleges/Information/Information-Communications-Technology-ICT-in-Schools/digital-learning-framework-post-primary.pdf. Accessed 20 Apr 2020.
|
|
Elliott, J. (1994). The teacher’s role in curriculum development: An unresolved issue in English attempts at curriculum reform. Curriculum Studies, 2(1), 43–69.
|
|
Erstad, O., & Voogt, J. (2018). The twenty-first century curriculum: issues and challenges. In J. Voogt, et al. (Eds.), Second handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education (pp. 19–36). Springer International Handbooks of Education. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71054-9_1. Accessed 20 Oct 2019.
|
|
European Commission. (2018). Commission staff working document accompanying the document proposal for a council recommendation on key competences for lifelong learning. Brussels: European Union.
|
|
Fullan, M. G., & Miles, M. B. (1992). Getting reform right: What works and what doesn’t. Phi delta kappan, 73(10), 745–752.
|
|
Giroux, H. (2002). Teachers as transformatory intellectuals. EDucate, 1(2), 46–49.
|
|
Giroux, H. A. (2010). In defense of public school teachers in a time of crisis. Policy Futures in Education, 8(6), 709–714.
|
|
Government of Alberta. (2019). Curriculum development. https://www.alberta.ca/curriculum-development.aspx. Accessed 17 Apr 2013.
|
|
Hargreaves, A., & Shirley, D. L. (2009). The Fourth Way: The inspiring future for educational change. Thousand Oaks (California): Corwin Press.
|
|
Kärkkäinen, K. (2012). Bringing about curriculum innovations (OECD Education Working Papers No. 82). Paris: OECD Publishing (NJ1).
|
|
Kelly, A. V. (2004). The curriculum: Theory and practice (5th ed.). London: Sage Publications.
|
|
Klenowski, V. (2015). Questioning the validity of multiple uses of NAPLAN data. In R. Lingard, G. Thompson, & S. Sellar (Eds.), National Testing in Schools: An Australian assessment (pp. 44–56). London: Routledge.
|
|
McLaughlin, M. (1990). The RAND change agent study revisited: Macro perspectives and micro realities. Educational Researcher, 19, 11–16.
|
|
OECD. (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. Paris: OECD. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030/E2030%20Position%20Paper%20(05.04.2018).pdf. Accessed 11 Jul 2019.
|
|
OECD. (2019). Education at a glance 2019: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.https://doi.org/10.1787/f8d7880d-en. Accessed 21 Apr 2020.
|
|
Priestley, M. (2011). Schools, teachers, and curriculum change: A balancing act? Journal of educational change, 12(1), 1–23.
|
|
Priestley, M., & Biesta, G. (Eds.). (2013). Reinventing the curriculum: New trends in curriculum policy and practice. London: A & C Black.
|
|
Priestley, M., & Sinnema, C. (2014). Downgraded curriculum? An analysis of knowledge in new curricula in Scotland and New Zealand. Curriculum Journal, 25(1), 50–75.
|
|
Qualifacitions and Curriculum Using technology to support curriculum development
|
|
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2014). What makes for powerful classrooms, and how can we support teachers in creating them? A story of research and practice, productively intertwined. Educational researcher, 43(8), 404–412.
|
|
Sinnema, C., & Aitken, G. (2014). Teachers’ use of research to improve practice: Why should we, how could we? In A. St George, S. Brown, O'Neill J (Eds.), Facing the big questions in teaching: Purpose, power and learning. North Shore: Cengage Learning.
|
|
Taguma, M., & Barrera, M. (2019). OECD future of education and skills 2030: Curriculum analysis. Paris: OECD.
|
|
Tedesco, J. C., Opertti, R., & Amadio, M. (2013). The curriculum debate: why it is important today (IBE Working Papers on Curriculum Issues No. 10). UNESCO International Bureau of Education. https://www.ibe.unesco.org/en/document/curriculum-debate-why-it-important-today-ibe-working-papers-curriculum-issues-n%C2%B0-10
|
|
Tuinamuana, K. (2011). Teacher professional standards, accountability, and ideology: Alternative discourses. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 36(12), 72.
|
|
Twining, P. (2018, October). Educational alignment (and sociocultural theory). halfbaked.education Blog. https://halfbaked.education/educational-alignment-and-sociocultural-theory/. Accessed 21 Apr 2020.
|
|
Twining, P. (2019a, August). What should be learnt? halfbaked.education Blog. https://halfbaked.education/what-should-be-learnt/. Accessed 21 Apr 2020.
|
|
Twining, P., Browne, N., Murphy, P., Hempel-Jorgensen, A., Harrison, S., & Parmar, N. (2017). NP3 – New Purposes, New Practices, New Pedagogy: Meta-analysis report. Society for Educational Studies, London. http://oro.open.ac.uk/view/person/nb8738.html. Accessed 25 Jan 2018.
|
|
Twining, P., Butler, D., Fisser, P. et al. Developing a quality curriculum in a technological era. Education Tech Research Dev (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09857-3
|
|
Twining, P., Rix, J., & Sheehy, K. (2016). Developing point of learning: An innovative approach to enhancing professional learning. London: Imagine Education. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313184671_Developing_Point_of_Learning_An_innovative_approach_to_enhancing_professional_learning. Accessed 21 Apr 2020.
|
|
United Nations General Assembly. (2015, September 25). Resolution 70/1: Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E
|
|
Val Dusek (2006) The Philosophy of echnology. Blackwell Publishing
|
|
van den Akker, J. (2003). Curriculum perspectives: An introduction. In J. van den Akker, W. Kuiper, & U. Hameyer (Eds.), Curriculum landscapes and trends (pp. 1–10). Dordrecht: Springer.
|
|
Williamson, B. (2017). Coding for what? Lessons from computing in the curriculum. NAACE Advancing Education. https://mirandanet.ac.uk/blog/2017/09/02/coding-lessonscomputing-curriculum/
|
|
Wills, J. S., & Sandholtz, J. H. (2009). Constrained professionalism: Dilemas of teaching in the face of test-based accountability. Teachers College Record, 111(4), 1065–1114.
|
|
World Bank. (2012). Systems approach for better education results – Finland – School Autonomy and accountability. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/17510/799460WP0SABER0Box0379797B00PUBLIC0.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. Accessed 21 Apr 2020.
|